Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYPDX
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYPDX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$86.38
Change+$0.14 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
Rydex Consumer Products A
Price$127.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.58M
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYPDX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYPDX (39.6M). RYPDX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYPDX (1.82) vs FDTGX (1.43). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYPDX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYPDX (21 years). RYPDX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX (45.00) and RYPDX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. RYPDX initial investment is less costly to investors than FDTGX (4%) vs FDTGX (4%). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPDX: FDTGX (0) vs RYPDX (2500). RYPDX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYPDX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). RYPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.70 vs. FDTGX (-5.96). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.37 vs. RYPDX (-15.58).
| FDTGX | RYPDX | FDTGX / RYPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.65 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.585 | 3.686 | -16% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 39.6M | 3,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.82 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.96 | -4.70 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.91 | -15.11 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.37 | -15.58 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.60 | -21.07 | 12% |