Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGAFX
FDYZX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGAFX
FDYZX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDYZX (29.1B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDYZX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDYZX (0.52) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYZX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGAFX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. RGAFX (6.44). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. RGAFX (17.38).
| FDYZX | RGAFX | FDYZX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.34 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.34 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.247 | 8.020 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.1B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 6.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.85 | 45.06 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | 17.38 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 336.35 | 113.52 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement