It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FERG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOOL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FERG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POOL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FERG (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while POOL (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.92%.
FERG is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2024.
POOL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
FERG | POOL | FERG / POOL | |
Capitalization | 44.3B | 15.5B | 286% |
EBITDA | 2.81B | 787M | 357% |
Gain YTD | 8.173 | -7.441 | -110% |
P/E Ratio | 25.27 | 30.08 | 84% |
Revenue | 29.4B | 5.54B | 530% |
Total Cash | 639M | 66.5M | 961% |
Total Debt | 5.29B | 1.36B | 388% |
FERG | POOL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
POOL's Valuation (46) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FERG (57) in the null industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew similarly to FERG’s over the last 12 months.
FERG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POOL (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FERG’s stock grew somewhat faster than POOL’s over the last 12 months.
POOL's SMR Rating (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FERG (90) in the null industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FERG’s over the last 12 months.
POOL's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FERG (52) in the null industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew similarly to FERG’s over the last 12 months.
FERG's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as POOL (43) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FERG’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
FERG | POOL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 3 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago49% | 9 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FERG has been loosely correlated with CNM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FERG jumps, then CNM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FERG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FERG | 100% | +1.83% | ||
CNM - FERG | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
BXC - FERG | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
AIT - FERG | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
SITE - FERG | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.58% | ||
BECN - FERG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More |