UNH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FFA | UNH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 45% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFA and DHR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFA and DHR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFA | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| DHR - FFA | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| JPM - FFA | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.31% | ||
| AAPL - FFA | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MSFT - FFA | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| UNH - FFA | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNH has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNH jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.