Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLSX
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.42
Change-$1.71 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$52.50
Change-$1.63 (-3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.66B
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LGLSX (7.66B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: FFAFX (0.53) vs LGLSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. FFAFX (4.85). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. LGLSX (18.45).
| FFAFX | LGLSX | FFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 14.537 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 7.66B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 14.25 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.39 | 110.05 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.26 | 18.45 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement