Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$68.64
Change+$6.53 (+10.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A
Price$14.12
Change+$0.46 (+3.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.29M
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. NWAUX (143M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWAUX: FFAFX (0.68) vs NWAUX (0.63). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (4 years) vs NWAUX (4 years). NWAUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 217.11 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.84 vs. NWAUX (-16.33).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.11 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.294 | -9.476 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 143M | 172,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.63 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.84 | -16.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.95 | 7.53 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...