Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.56
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A
Price$14.48
Change+$0.10 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.98M
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NWAUX (269M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAUX (1.15) vs FFAFX (0.55). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWAUX (5 years). NWAUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 217.11 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. NWAUX (-14.14).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.11 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.353 | -3.331 | -581% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 269M | 126,766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.09 | -14.14 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.95 | 36.05 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement