Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A
Price$14.18
Change-$0.10 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.79M
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NWAUX (248M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAUX (1.20) vs FFAFX (0.53). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWAUX (5 years). NWAUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 217.11 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. NWAUX (-18.40).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.11 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | -5.334 | -301% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 248M | 131,855% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.20 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | -18.40 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 27.07 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |