Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAUX (401M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAUX (2.26) vs FFAFX (0.44). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (6 years) vs NWAUX (5 years). NWAUX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. NWAUX (1.28). NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 38.63 vs. FFAFX (20.39).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.89 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.98 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.723 | 6.190 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 401M | 90,025% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 2.26 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.85 | 1.28 | 689% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 23.38 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 38.63 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers