Ad is loading...
FFANX vs HBLCX
FFANX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFANX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40%
Price$13.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.91
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FFANX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFANX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFANX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FFANX (2.26B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFANX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FFANX (2.42). FFANX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFANX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFANX (21.00). FFANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFANX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFANX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFANX (500). FFANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. HBLCX (2.70). FFANX return over 5 years is better than : 20.05 vs. HBLCX (4.09).
| FFANX | HBLCX | FFANX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.386 | 0.072 | 538% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 12B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 2.70 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.75 | -4.62 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.05 | 4.09 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 24.54 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers