FFBC
Price
$32.91
Change
-$0.88 (-2.60%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBIN
Price
$53.50
Change
-$0.90 (-1.65%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs MBIN

FFBC vs MBIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. MBIN commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and MBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $33.79 vs. MBIN: $54.40)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and MBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 49% vs. MBIN: 53%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.55B vs. MBIN: $2.5B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.55B. MBIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than MBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than MBIN.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while MBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.85% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($3.55B) has a higher market cap than MBIN($2.5B). FFBC has higher P/E ratio than MBIN: FFBC (11.94) vs MBIN (10.93). MBIN YTD gains are higher at: 60.487 vs. FFBC (37.382). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. MBIN (19.6M). FFBC has less debt than MBIN: FFBC (1B) vs MBIN (4.63B). FFBC has higher revenues than MBIN: FFBC (962M) vs MBIN (706M).
FFBCMBINFFBC / MBIN
Capitalization3.55B2.5B142%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.38260.48762%
P/E Ratio11.9410.93109%
Revenue962M706M136%
Total Cash171M19.6M872%
Total Debt1B4.63B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs MBIN: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
MBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6878
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2340
SMR RATING
1..100
3538
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (70). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (40). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (38). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

MBIN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (47). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBIN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (28). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCMBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMLC25.59-0.04
-0.16%
VanEck JPMorgan EMLcl Ccy Bd ETF
PIM3.17-0.01
-0.31%
Picard Medical Inc
EKG20.91-0.09
-0.43%
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF
JUST110.55-0.55
-0.50%
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
LRNZ63.50-1.55
-2.39%
TrueShares Tech, AI and Deep Lrng ETF

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.11%
UCB - FFBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
CATY - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
PRK - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
TRMK - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
AUB - FFBC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
More