FFBC
Price
$31.67
Change
+$0.16 (+0.51%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:05 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.36B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBIN
Price
$50.12
Change
+$0.40 (+0.80%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs MBIN

FFBC vs MBIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. MBIN commentary
Oct 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and MBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs MBIN: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
MBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5889
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2841
SMR RATING
1..100
1416
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (67). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (41). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (16). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

MBIN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (47). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBIN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (30). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCMBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $31.51 vs. MBIN: $49.72)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and MBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 116% vs. MBIN: 108%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.36B vs. MBIN: $2.37B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.36B. MBIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while MBIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MBIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than MBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than MBIN.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while MBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHNU38.931.76
+4.73%
Volatility Shares 2x Chainlink ETF (CHNU)
ARKW165.903.01
+1.85%
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW)
MARZ37.610.38
+1.03%
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ)
OPER100.11-0.01
-0.01%
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER)
HPI13.81-0.34
-2.40%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.13%
CATY - FFBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
UCB - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
UBSI - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
BUSE - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
AUB - FFBC
83%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More

MBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been loosely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIN
1D Price
Change %
MBIN100%
-0.46%
CAC - MBIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
WSBF - MBIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FFBC - MBIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
LOB - MBIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
BUSE - MBIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More