FFBC
Price
$33.83
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NBHC
Price
$43.19
Change
+$0.61 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs NBHC

FFBC vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. NBHC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and NBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $33.83 vs. NBHC: $43.19)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 48% vs. NBHC: 113%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.55B vs. NBHC: $1.92B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.55B. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($3.55B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.92B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: NBHC (18.15) vs FFBC (11.95). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 37.545 vs. NBHC (15.401). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. FFBC (171M). NBHC has less debt than FFBC: NBHC (202M) vs FFBC (1B). FFBC has higher revenues than NBHC: FFBC (962M) vs NBHC (436M).
FFBCNBHCFFBC / NBHC
Capitalization3.55B1.92B185%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.54515.401244%
P/E Ratio11.9518.1566%
Revenue962M436M221%
Total Cash171M369M46%
Total Debt1B202M496%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2466
SMR RATING
1..100
3552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2818
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (38). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBHC (66). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (52). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (50). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (28). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXI198.261.02
+0.52%
iShares Global Industrials ETF
NDAA23.810.08
+0.36%
Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF
DDTJ20.220.06
+0.32%
Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buff ETF-Jan
SDSI51.21N/A
N/A
American Century® Short Dur Str Inc ETF
QQQD12.88-0.43
-3.23%
Direxion Daily Concentrated Qs Bear 1X Shares

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+1.43%
PEBO - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
CATY - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
TRMK - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FFBC - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
WSBC - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More