EFSC
Price
$63.67
Change
-$0.34 (-0.53%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FFBC
Price
$33.03
Change
+$0.08 (+0.24%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.47B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs FFBC

EFSC vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. FFBC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and FFBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $63.67 vs. FFBC: $33.03)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 56% vs. FFBC: 55%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.3B vs. FFBC: $3.47B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.3B. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.15% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($3.47B) has a higher market cap than EFSC($2.3B). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: EFSC (12.66) vs FFBC (11.67). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 34.292 vs. EFSC (19.265). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 259M vs. FFBC (171M). EFSC has less debt than FFBC: EFSC (682M) vs FFBC (1B). FFBC has higher revenues than EFSC: FFBC (962M) vs EFSC (643M).
EFSCFFBCEFSC / FFBC
Capitalization2.3B3.47B66%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.26534.29256%
P/E Ratio12.6611.67108%
Revenue643M962M67%
Total Cash259M171M151%
Total Debt682M1B68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4023
SMR RATING
1..100
3635
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3133
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (54). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (40). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (36). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (52). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (33). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUKX37.641.43
+3.96%
Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF
GSEW98.330.66
+0.68%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
FEMB29.730.18
+0.59%
First Trust Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd ETF
BYRE27.67-0.05
-0.18%
Principal Real Estate Active Opp ETF
KOLD30.77-0.16
-0.52%
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natrl Gas

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.53%
BUSE - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
FRME - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
THFF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
TRMK - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
BY - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+0.24%
UCB - FFBC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
CATY - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
PRK - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UBSI - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
EFSC - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More