Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs FSWCX
FFFMX vs FSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs FSWCX
FFFMX vs FSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSWCX (8.49B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than FFFMX: FSWCX (1.91) vs FFFMX (1.70). FFFMX was incepted earlier than FSWCX: FFFMX (6 years) vs FSWCX (8 years). FFFMX (0.32) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: FSWCX (0) vs FFFMX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.09 vs. FFFMX (10.83). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. FFFMX (38.08).
| FFFMX | FSWCX | FFFMX / FSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.11 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.11 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.123 | 16.059 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 8.49B | 1,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 33.09 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.21 | 62.89 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.08 | 46.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement