Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs FSWCX
FFFMX vs FSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs FSWCX
FFFMX vs FSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSWCX (9.03B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than FFFMX: FSWCX (1.94) vs FFFMX (1.68). FFFMX was incepted earlier than FSWCX: FFFMX (6 years) vs FSWCX (9 years). FFFMX (0.32) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: FSWCX (0) vs FFFMX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.11 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.62 vs. FFFMX (41.56).
| FFFMX | FSWCX | FFFMX / FSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.11 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.11 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 15.985 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 9.03B | 1,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.94 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 24.11 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 56.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 49.62 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement