Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs GBCAX
FFFMX vs GBCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs GBCAX
FFFMX vs GBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GBCAX (21.9M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: FFFMX (1.70) vs GBCAX (0.00). FFFMX was incepted earlier than GBCAX: FFFMX (6 years) vs GBCAX (22 years). GBCAX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). GBCAX (31.00) and FFFMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: FFFMX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. GBCAX (9.24). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. GBCAX (-6.09).
| FFFMX | GBCAX | FFFMX / GBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.94 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.94 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.782 | 7.382 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 21.9M | 525,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 9.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.06 | 15.18 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -6.09 | -628% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers