Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs GBCAX
FFFMX vs GBCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs GBCAX
FFFMX vs GBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GBCAX (21.7M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: FFFMX (1.70) vs GBCAX (0.00). FFFMX was incepted earlier than GBCAX: FFFMX (6 years) vs GBCAX (22 years). GBCAX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). GBCAX (31.00) and FFFMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: FFFMX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. GBCAX (6.04). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.91 vs. GBCAX (-4.51).
| FFFMX | GBCAX | FFFMX / GBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.94 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.94 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.672 | 6.701 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 21.7M | 539,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 6.04 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.43 | 14.10 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | -4.51 | -885% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers