Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HDGCX
FFFMX vs HDGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HDGCX
FFFMX vs HDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGCX (18.4B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: FFFMX (1.70) vs HDGCX (0.38). FFFMX was incepted earlier than HDGCX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HDGCX (28 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: FFFMX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). FFFMX (9.94) and HDGCX (9.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.91 vs. HDGCX (18.27).
| FFFMX | HDGCX | FFFMX / HDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.672 | 8.062 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 18.4B | 636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.38 | 452% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 9.54 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.43 | 23.69 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | 18.27 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement