Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HDGCX
FFFMX vs HDGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HDGCX
FFFMX vs HDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGCX (18.6B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: FFFMX (1.68) vs HDGCX (0.31). FFFMX was incepted earlier than HDGCX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HDGCX (28 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: FFFMX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. HDGCX (8.06). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. HDGCX (18.53).
| FFFMX | HDGCX | FFFMX / HDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 10.289 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 18.6B | 634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 0.31 | 546% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 8.06 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 22.72 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 18.53 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement