Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs LBSCX
FFFMX vs LBSCX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs LBSCX
FFFMX vs LBSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSCX (48B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: FFFMX (1.68) vs LBSCX (0.60). FFFMX was incepted earlier than LBSCX: FFFMX (6 years) vs LBSCX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: FFFMX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. FFFMX (10.24). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.31 vs. LBSCX (37.77).
| FFFMX | LBSCX | FFFMX / LBSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.65 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.65 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.572 | 9.615 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 48B | 244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 0.60 | 281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 13.25 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.35 | 35.28 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.31 | 37.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers