Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs LMLSX
FFFMX vs LMLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs LMLSX
FFFMX vs LMLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LMLSX (2.41B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than LMLSX: FFFMX (1.68) vs LMLSX (1.12). FFFMX was incepted earlier than LMLSX: FFFMX (6 years) vs LMLSX (13 years). LMLSX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: FFFMX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). FFFMX (9.57) and LMLSX (9.28) have marching annual gain over last year. FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. LMLSX (20.03).
| FFFMX | LMLSX | FFFMX / LMLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.44 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.44 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 12.713 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.41B | 4,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.12 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 9.28 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 18.05 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 20.03 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement