Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs LMLSX
FFFMX vs LMLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs LMLSX
FFFMX vs LMLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LMLSX (2.36B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than LMLSX: FFFMX (1.70) vs LMLSX (1.21). FFFMX was incepted earlier than LMLSX: FFFMX (6 years) vs LMLSX (13 years). LMLSX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: FFFMX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.99 vs. LMLSX (10.12). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.88 vs. LMLSX (18.99).
| FFFMX | LMLSX | FFFMX / LMLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.44 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.44 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.825 | 9.817 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.36B | 4,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.21 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.99 | 10.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.62 | 18.69 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.88 | 18.99 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement