Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs RSDFX
FFFMX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs RSDFX
FFFMX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSDFX (2.53B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than FFFMX: RSDFX (2.40) vs FFFMX (1.68). FFFMX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: FFFMX (6 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RSDFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: RSDFX (0) vs FFFMX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. RSDFX (34.98).
| FFFMX | RSDFX | FFFMX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.74 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.74 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 15.642 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.53B | 4,666% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 2.40 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 18.07 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 45.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 34.98 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement