Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs TRCPX
FFFMX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs TRCPX
FFFMX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRCPX (6.46B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than TRCPX: FFFMX (1.68) vs TRCPX (1.27). FFFMX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: FFFMX (6 years) vs TRCPX (17 years). TRCPX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRCPX (17.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: TRCPX (0) vs FFFMX (250). TRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. TRCPX (31.87).
| FFFMX | TRCPX | FFFMX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.55 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.55 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 15.491 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.27 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 16.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 41.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 31.87 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement