Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs TRCVX
FFFMX vs TRCVX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs TRCVX
FFFMX vs TRCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRCVX (13.2B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than TRCVX: FFFMX (1.70) vs TRCVX (1.40). FFFMX was incepted earlier than TRCVX: FFFMX (6 years) vs TRCVX (24 years). FFFMX (0.32) is less costly to investors than TRCVX (0.30). TRCVX (31.00) and FFFMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. TRCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: TRCVX (0) vs FFFMX (250). TRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.82 vs. FFFMX (9.94). TRCVX return over 5 years is better than : 48.09 vs. FFFMX (39.91).
| FFFMX | TRCVX | FFFMX / TRCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.30 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.30 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.672 | 15.846 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 13.2B | 886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.40 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 24.82 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.43 | 54.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | 48.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MADCX | 40.38 | 0.41 | +1.03% |
| BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl | |||
| NILTX | 16.51 | 0.09 | +0.55% |
| Neuberger International Sel Tr | |||
| EAASX | 29.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A | |||
| HWSIX | 86.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I | |||
| SLGYX | 23.23 | N/A | N/A |
| Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth A | |||