Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs GRHAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.20
Change-$0.21 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.56M
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail
Price$15.83
Change-$0.22 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.89M
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. GRHAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and GRHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. GRHAX (560M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: GRHAX (3.16) vs FFGTX (1.78). FFGTX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs GRHAX (9 years). GRHAX (1.47) and FFGTX (1.40) have similar cost to investors . FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GRHAX (11.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FFGTX (0) vs GRHAX (3000). GRHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. FFGTX (8.35). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 234.41 vs. FFGTX (100.23).
| FFGTX | GRHAX | FFGTX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.29 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.47 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.535 | 29.227 | 43% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 888M | 560M | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 3.16 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 25.67 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.87 | 51.59 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.23 | 234.41 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.25 | N/A | - |