Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs GRHAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$17.81
Change+$0.17 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail
Price$12.59
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets418.61M
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. GRHAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and GRHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. GRHAX (419M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: GRHAX (3.77) vs FFGTX (1.87). FFGTX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs GRHAX (8 years). GRHAX (1.47) and FFGTX (1.40) have similar cost to investors . FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GRHAX (11.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FFGTX (0) vs GRHAX (3000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.12 vs. GRHAX (-5.14). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 231.64 vs. FFGTX (104.74).
| FFGTX | GRHAX | FFGTX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.29 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.47 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.727 | 0.644 | -268% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 419M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 3.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | -5.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.83 | -8.10 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.74 | 231.64 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...