Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs GRHAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.89
Change+$0.22 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets852.36M
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail
Price$14.05
Change+$0.26 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets469.56M
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. GRHAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and GRHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 852M vs. GRHAX (470M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: GRHAX (3.48) vs FFGTX (1.86). FFGTX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs GRHAX (8 years). GRHAX (1.47) and FFGTX (1.40) have similar cost to investors . FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GRHAX (11.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FFGTX (0) vs GRHAX (3000). GRHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.82 vs. FFGTX (-4.10). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 202.88 vs. FFGTX (88.83).
| FFGTX | GRHAX | FFGTX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.29 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.47 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.011 | 11.031 | 36% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 470M | 181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 3.48 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.10 | -2.82 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.04 | 7.75 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.83 | 202.88 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement