Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$48.70
Change+$0.20 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.56M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and PNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. PNRCX (714M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.67) vs PNRCX (0.53). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. FFGTX (13.05). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 142.12 vs. FFGTX (115.83).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.774 | 23.473 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 714M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.53 | 316% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 16.25 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.96 | 40.25 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.83 | 142.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.58 | 125.90 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement