Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$19.76
Change-$0.11 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.15M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$43.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets687.18M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 878M vs. PNRCX (687M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.77) vs PNRCX (0.56). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.88 vs. PNRCX (10.90). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 105.24 vs. FFGTX (92.25).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.696 | 11.253 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 687M | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.56 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.88 | 10.90 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | 18.07 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.25 | 105.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.31 | 79.05 | 126% |