Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.71
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.15M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$45.38
Change+$0.33 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets702.4M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 878M vs. PNRCX (702M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.77) vs PNRCX (0.56). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. PNRCX (8.11). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 109.60 vs. FFGTX (96.57).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.986 | 14.689 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 702M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.56 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 8.11 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 8.56 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.57 | 109.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.57 | 84.09 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement