Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.60
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.12M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets937.61K
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 920M vs. SEPCX (938K). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.63) vs SEPCX (1.50). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. SEPCX (-6.42). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 83.94 vs. SEPCX (49.77).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.220 | 4.064 | 473% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 938K | 98,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.50 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -6.42 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.89 | -1.82 | -543% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.94 | 49.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.49 | 11.20 | 1,290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement