Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1M
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. SEPCX (1M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.67) vs SEPCX (1.46). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. SEPCX (1.16). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 101.83 vs. SEPCX (72.80).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.825 | 5.775 | 291% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 1M | 89,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.46 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.79 | 1.16 | 1,450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | 12.04 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.83 | 72.80 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.13 | 19.33 | 663% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement