Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.15M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets977.5K
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 878M vs. SEPCX (978K). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.77) vs SEPCX (1.53). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. SEPCX (-5.42). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 91.03 vs. SEPCX (59.75).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.643 | 2.781 | 419% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 978K | 89,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.53 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | -5.42 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 7.47 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.03 | 59.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.02 | 6.05 | 1,668% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement