Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$17.81
Change+$0.17 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$8.88
Change+$0.14 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets996.52K
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. SEPCX (997K). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.87) vs SEPCX (1.48). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SEPCX (22 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.12 vs. SEPCX (-15.95). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 104.74 vs. SEPCX (76.69).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.727 | -5.027 | 34% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 997K | 87,864% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.48 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | -15.95 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.83 | -11.76 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.74 | 76.69 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.83 | -21.78 | -243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers