Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$19.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets852.36M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1M
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 852M vs. SEPCX (1M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.86) vs SEPCX (1.60). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SEPCX (22 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. SEPCX (-8.34). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 106.30 vs. SEPCX (70.26).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 0.963 | 903% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 1M | 85,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.60 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | -8.34 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.95 | 11.80 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.30 | 70.26 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.58 | -8.15 | -940% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement