FFIN
Price
$31.73
Change
-$0.32 (-1.00%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.59B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$22.65
Change
-$0.32 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.39B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFIN vs FULT

FFIN vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFIN vs. FULT commentary
Sep 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIN is a Buy and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIN vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FFIN
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6786
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
1611
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5437
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIN (91). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIN (100). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIN (16). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIN (56). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIN (54). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFINFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2026
Stock price -- (FFIN: $31.73 vs. FULT: $22.65)
Brand notoriety: FFIN and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFIN: 138% vs. FULT: 107%
Market capitalization -- FFIN: $4.59B vs. FULT: $4.39B
FFIN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.59B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FFIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than FFIN.

Price Growth

FFIN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AINT34.550.22
+0.65%
Finq Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI Managed Equity ETF
EMHY38.950.01
+0.03%
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY)
SIXF35.23-0.01
-0.04%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF)
CGDG37.47-0.11
-0.29%
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG)
CSTK32.57-0.15
-0.47%
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK)

FFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIN
1D Price
Change %
FFIN100%
-1.00%
UBSI - FFIN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
UCB - FFIN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
HWC - FFIN
83%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
HOMB - FFIN
82%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
FULT - FFIN
82%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.39%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
HWC - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
More