Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLCX
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$12.81
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.95
Change+$0.12 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FFNCX (2.22B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLCX (2.64) vs FFNCX (1.69). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNCX (18 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FFNCX (1.53). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.08 vs. HBLCX (2.30). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.18 vs. HBLCX (12.10).
| FFNCX | HBLCX | FFNCX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.64 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.64 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.343 | 0.043 | -3,143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 11.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 2.64 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 2.30 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.65 | 2.02 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.18 | 12.10 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.06 | 20.94 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers