Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLCX
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$13.09
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLCX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FFNCX (2.25B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FFNCX (1.43). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNCX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. FFNCX (13.22). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.31 vs. HBLCX (11.68).
| FFNCX | HBLCX | FFNCX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.367 | 7.732 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 12.5B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.65 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 14.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | -3.25 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.31 | 11.68 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.63 | 28.76 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...