Ad is loading...
FFNTX vs HBLCX
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% M
Price$13.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.14B
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FFNTX (2.26B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FFNTX (1.92). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNTX (17 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNTX (21.00). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNTX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNTX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNTX (500). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.32 vs. HBLCX (5.15). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.15 vs. HBLCX (5.90).
| FFNTX | HBLCX | FFNTX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.624 | 2.083 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 12.1B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 5.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.28 | -0.94 | -348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.15 | 5.90 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.09 | 25.81 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers