Ad is loading...
FFNTX vs HBLCX
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% M
Price$13.05
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.04
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLCX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FFNTX (2.2B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLCX (2.67) vs FFNTX (2.21). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNTX (18 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FFNTX (1.03). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNTX (13.00). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNTX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNTX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNTX (500). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. HBLCX (3.49). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.89 vs. HBLCX (14.56).
| FFNTX | HBLCX | FFNTX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.64 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.64 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.267 | 1.562 | 81% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 11.7B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 2.67 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 3.49 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 5.15 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.89 | 14.56 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.58 | 24.05 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers