Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTY vs IMCG
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FFTY vs IMCG
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTY vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTY is a Hold and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 4B vs. FFTY (89.1M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FFTY: IMCG (21.723) vs FFTY (15.139). FFTY was incepted earlier than IMCG: FFTY (11 years) vs IMCG (22 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFTY (0.80). FFTY has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| FFTY | IMCG | FFTY / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 15.139 | 21.723 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 89.1M | 4B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,333% |
| Turnover | 1209.00 | 35.00 | 3,454% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 0.61 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFTY | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFTY has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFTY jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFTY | 100% | -3.21% | ||
| ON - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CZR - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ACLS - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LSCC - FFTY | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ITT - FFTY | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ROK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ROK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| ROK - IMCG | 71% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| CMI - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| RRX - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| KEYS - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| AME - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
More | ||||