Advertisement
FGBIP vs NSTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBIP is a Buy and NSTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGBIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FGBIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FGBIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FGBIP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NSTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FGBIP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
NSTS is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.20% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FGBIP | NSTS | FGBIP / NSTS | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 50.7M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.070 | 2.119 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 175.44 | - |
| Revenue | 93.5M | 4.95M | 1,888% |
| Total Cash | 59.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 269M | 32.8M | 820% |
| FGBIP | NSTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 21% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 8 days ago 35% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
FGBIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBIP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBIP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGBIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGBIP | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| WAL - FGBIP | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| UMBF - FGBIP | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| CMA - FGBIP | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| KEY - FGBIP | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| BKU - FGBIP | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
NSTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSTS | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| FULTP - NSTS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FGBIP - NSTS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| PFIS - NSTS | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| SMBK - NSTS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| HBCP - NSTS | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||