FGBIP
Price
$19.29
Change
-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Updated
Aug 7, 01:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
NSTS
Price
$12.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGBIP vs NSTS

Header iconFGBIP vs NSTS Comparison
Open Charts FGBIP vs NSTSBanner chart's image
First Guaranty Bancshares
Price$19.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NSTS Ban
Price$12.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.71M
FGBIP vs NSTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGBIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBIP vs. NSTS commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBIP is a Hold and NSTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FGBIP: $19.30 vs. NSTS: $12.15)
Brand notoriety: FGBIP and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBIP: 157% vs. NSTS: 18%
Market capitalization -- FGBIP: $0 vs. NSTS: $50.71M
FGBIP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGBIP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGBIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGBIP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGBIP is a better buy in the short-term than NSTS.

Price Growth

FGBIP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.00% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSTS YTD gains are higher at: 2.966 vs. FGBIP (0.492). NSTS has less debt than FGBIP: NSTS (32.8M) vs FGBIP (269M). FGBIP has higher revenues than NSTS: FGBIP (93.5M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
FGBIPNSTSFGBIP / NSTS
CapitalizationN/A50.7M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.4922.96617%
P/E RatioN/A175.44-
Revenue93.5M4.95M1,888%
Total Cash59.6MN/A-
Total Debt269M32.8M820%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGBIPNSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGBIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKFRY23.890.15
+0.63%
AB SKF
OGE45.610.19
+0.42%
OGE Energy Corp
ACCS12.000.01
+0.04%
ACCESS Newswire Inc
HIMX8.63-0.06
-0.69%
Himax Technologies
DIN20.41-1.40
-6.42%
Dine Brands Global

FGBIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBIP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBIP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGBIP
1D Price
Change %
FGBIP100%
+0.26%
WAL - FGBIP
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
UMBF - FGBIP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
CMA - FGBIP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
KEY - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
BKU - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
-0.33%
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More