Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UPMMX
FGDCX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UPMMX
FGDCX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UPMMX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UPMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. UPMMX (1.34B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FGDCX (5.60) vs UPMMX (0.14). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FGDCX (20 years) vs UPMMX (16 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UPMMX (1.35). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UPMMX (15.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FGDCX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). UPMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.10 vs. FGDCX (68.23). UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 239.34 vs. FGDCX (185.95).
| FGDCX | UPMMX | FGDCX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.35 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.35 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.928 | 21.546 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.34B | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 0.14 | 3,984% |
| Returns for 1 year | 68.23 | 77.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 247.60 | 283.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.95 | 239.34 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.71 | 254.91 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers