Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDIX vs FGDTX
FGDIX vs FGDTX Comparison
Open Charts FGDIX vs FGDTX
FGDIX vs FGDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDIX vs. FGDTX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDIX is a Hold and FGDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDIX (4.23B) and FGDTX (4.23B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FGDTX (4.70) and FGDIX (4.70) have matching dividends . FGDIX was incepted earlier than FGDTX: FGDIX (19 years) vs FGDTX (19 years). FGDTX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FGDIX (0.69). FGDIX (60.00) and FGDTX (60.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGDIX (0) and FGDTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGDIX (59.54) and FGDTX (58.73) have marching annual gain over last year. FGDIX return over 5 years is better than : 112.40 vs. FGDTX (106.74).
| FGDIX | FGDTX | FGDIX / FGDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.19 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.19 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.138 | 3.916 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 4.23B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.70 | 4.70 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.54 | 58.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 174.66 | 170.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.40 | 106.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.23 | 190.95 | 107% |