FGDL
Price
$53.16
Change
-$0.45 (-0.84%)
Updated
Oct 23, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
430.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDX
Price
$80.21
Change
-$1.48 (-1.81%)
Updated
Oct 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
26.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGDL vs GDX

FGDL vs GDX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) vs. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX)

Key Takeaways

  • Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) provides direct exposure to physical gold bullion with a low 0.15% expense ratio, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) offers equity exposure to global gold mining companies at a 0.51% expense ratio.
  • FGDL holds a single asset—responsibly sourced physical gold—resulting in lower volatility tied purely to gold price movements, whereas GDX tracks approximately 60 mining stocks with operational and leverage risks.
  • Both ETFs target gold-related themes but differ structurally: FGDL is a grantor trust focused on bullion storage, and GDX is an equity ETF tracking a market-cap-weighted index of miners and royalty companies.
  • FGDL features minimal holdings concentration and no dividend yield, while GDX provides potential dividends from mining operations alongside higher sector-specific risks.
  • In the current environment of gold price sensitivity to interest rates and geopolitics, FGDL delivers purer commodity exposure, and GDX amplifies returns through equity beta to gold prices.
  • Cost efficiency and diversification profiles position the two ETFs as complementary rather than direct competitors for investors seeking gold sector allocation.

Introduction

Investors comparing gold exposure options often evaluate physical bullion vehicles against equity-based mining funds. Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) represent distinct approaches within the gold theme. FGDL delivers unlevered exposure to the spot price of responsibly sourced gold, while GDX provides leveraged equity participation in gold mining companies. They do not compete directly but serve as alternative strategies for investors seeking gold sector participation, differing in risk profiles, costs, and return drivers. This comparison highlights structural characteristics relevant across market cycles.

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) Overview

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is a passive grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM, less fund expenses. The fund holds physical gold bullion stored at JPMorgan Chase Bank in London, with bars meeting the London Bullion Market Association’s responsible sourcing standards. It maintains one primary holding—physical gold—with negligible cash allocations. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a single-asset commodity product, FGDL requires no rebalancing and offers straightforward exposure without operational or management risks associated with mining equities. Shares represent fractional ownership of the underlying gold, with tax treatment typically as collectibles.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive equity ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index includes global companies deriving significant revenue from gold and silver mining, royalties, or streaming activities. The fund typically holds around 60 securities, with top positions concentrated in large producers such as Newmont Corp, Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd, and Barrick Mining Corp. The expense ratio is 0.51%. GDX employs market-cap weighting with quarterly index rebalancing and provides dividend distributions from underlying holdings. It offers diversified equity exposure across developed and emerging markets, primarily Canada, the United States, Australia, and South Africa.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector benefits from macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and geopolitical tensions. Physical gold demand remains supported by central bank purchases and jewelry markets, while mining equities respond to production costs, reserve replacement, and commodity price leverage. Regulatory developments around responsible sourcing influence physical products, and capital flows into gold miners fluctuate with earnings cycles and merger activity. Broader sector risks include currency movements, labor disruptions, and environmental regulations affecting mining operations. Both ETFs operate within this environment, with physical exposure reacting directly to spot prices and equity exposure incorporating company-specific execution factors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FGDL has tracked gold spot price movements with lower volatility due to its direct physical backing. GDX has exhibited higher beta to gold prices, amplifying gains during rallies driven by rising bullion values but experiencing greater drawdowns during equity market stress or sector rotations. Performance differentials arise from miners’ operating leverage, dividend yields, and sensitivity to production guidance. Over broader timeframes, GDX positioning reflects equity market dynamics within materials, while FGDL maintains consistent commodity correlation. Relative positioning favors FGDL for pure price exposure and GDX for potential outperformance in strong gold price environments with favorable mining margins.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities in the gold sector and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency, minimal operational risk, and direct commodity exposure. Its lower expense ratio and single-asset simplicity provide clearer alignment with pure gold price trends. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) offers compelling diversification and yield potential but carries higher expense and equity-specific risks that may dilute returns in certain cycles. Selection depends on individual risk tolerance and objectives within broader portfolio construction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FGDL vs. GDX commentary
Oct 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDL is a Hold and GDX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FGDL with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

FGDL sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

FGDL saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 79%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 52 cases where FGDL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FGDL as a result. In 47 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.

FGDL moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for FGDL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGDL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.

The Aroon Indicator for FGDL entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

Following a +2.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGDL advanced for three days, in 230 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

FGDL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GDX with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

GDX sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

GDX saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 45 of the 49 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 51 of 62 cases where GDX's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDX as a result. In 70 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

GDX moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for GDX crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for GDX entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The 50-day moving average for GDX moved above the 200-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +5.17% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDX advanced for three days, in 292 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

GDX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGDLGDX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FGDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSVM67.491.16
+1.75%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM)
MSTI19.89N/A
N/A
Madison Short Term Strategic Income ETF (MSTI)
YDEC27.81-0.14
-0.51%
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (YDEC)
AIA126.53-4.99
-3.79%
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA)
USGG1.80-0.25
-12.20%
Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (USGG)