Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
Price$17.00
Change-$0.23 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.69
Change-$0.41 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.64B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIQX (1.5B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.61) vs RMEBX (1.05). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. RMEBX (4.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.54 vs. FGIQX (51.07).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.799 | 13.233 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 1.05 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 4.45 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.91 | 39.35 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.07 | 55.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.39 | 88.87 | -6% |