Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
Price$15.21
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FGIQX (1.39B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (2.44) vs RMEBX (1.21). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. FGIQX (0.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. FGIQX (45.31).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.476 | 2.865 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 1.21 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 5.09 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.59 | 17.98 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.31 | 58.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.61 | 60.34 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement