Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
Price$16.32
Change+$0.11 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIQX (1.48B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (2.15) vs RMEBX (1.12). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. FGIQX (8.01). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. FGIQX (51.53).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.386 | 9.495 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.12 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 11.31 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 28.70 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.53 | 60.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.33 | 77.57 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement