Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
Price$15.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. FGIQX (1.44B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (2.37) vs RMEBX (1.16). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. FGIQX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. FGIQX (46.29).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.315 | 5.923 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 1.16 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 8.54 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.49 | 27.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.29 | 58.69 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.70 | 68.22 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement