Ad is loading...
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
Price$14.52
Change+$0.91 (+6.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. FGIQX (1.25B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (2.38) vs RMEBX (1.18). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGIQX (26.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. FGIQX (-10.61). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. FGIQX (32.20).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.699 | -7.747 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 98.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 1.18 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.61 | -4.56 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.35 | -1.07 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.20 | 44.36 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.31 | 44.99 | -70% |