Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FGIQX (2.19B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.09) vs RMEBX (1.04). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.69). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.61 vs. RMEBX (9.98). FGIQX return over 5 years is better than : 44.48 vs. RMEBX (32.93).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.013 | 5.801 | 293% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.61 | 9.98 | 317% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.77 | 34.14 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.48 | 32.93 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.94 | 89.84 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement