Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FGIQX (3.05B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.12) vs RMEBX (0.99). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.69). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.79 vs. RMEBX (4.65). FGIQX return over 5 years is better than : 58.92 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.379 | 8.448 | 324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.79 | 4.65 | 598% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.51 | 34.88 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.92 | 34.68 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.01 | 92.45 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers