Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FGIQX (2.99B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.15) vs RMEBX (0.99). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.69). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.77 vs. RMEBX (9.03). FGIQX return over 5 years is better than : 56.46 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.497 | 10.367 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.77 | 9.03 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.86 | 38.30 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.46 | 35.75 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.47 | 90.55 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers