Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIWX vs RGFTX
FGIWX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIWX vs RGFTX
FGIWX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIWX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIWX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. FGIWX (574M). RGFTX (3.10) and FGIWX (3.04) have matching dividends . FGIWX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIWX (10 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FGIWX (1.00). FGIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIWX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIWX (1000000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. FGIWX (6.59). FGIWX return over 5 years is better than : 25.85 vs. RGFTX (23.08).
| FGIWX | RGFTX | FGIWX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.22 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.244 | 11.067 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 574M | 616M | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.10 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 10.29 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.53 | 36.69 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.85 | 23.08 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement