Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIWX vs RGFTX
FGIWX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIWX vs RGFTX
FGIWX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIWX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIWX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. FGIWX (558M). FGIWX pays higher dividends than RGFTX: FGIWX (3.13) vs RGFTX (2.68). FGIWX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIWX (10 years) vs RGFTX (10 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FGIWX (1.00). FGIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIWX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIWX (1000000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.68 vs. FGIWX (-1.45). RGFTX (17.49) and FGIWX (17.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIWX | RGFTX | FGIWX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.22 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.551 | 6.771 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 558M | 592M | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 2.68 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.45 | 2.68 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 38.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.31 | 17.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.75 | N/A | - |