FHB
Price
$29.14
Change
-$0.99 (-3.29%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.54B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$24.17
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.62B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHB vs FULT

FHB vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHB vs. FULT commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHB is a Hold and FULT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FHB: $29.14 vs. FULT: $24.17)
Brand notoriety: FHB and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHB: 351% vs. FULT: 43%
Market capitalization -- FHB: $3.54B vs. FULT: $4.62B
FHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.54B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than FHB.

Price Growth

FHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.96% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.62B) has a higher market cap than FHB($3.55B). FHB has higher P/E ratio than FULT: FHB (12.78) vs FULT (11.51). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 27.216 vs. FHB (17.494). FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. FHB (229M). FHB has less debt than FULT: FHB (0) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than FHB: FULT (1.33B) vs FHB (856M).
FHBFULTFHB / FULT
Capitalization3.55B4.62B77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.49427.21664%
P/E Ratio12.7811.51111%
Revenue856M1.33B65%
Total Cash229M312M73%
Total Debt01.25B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHB vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FHB
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3532
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6935
SMR RATING
1..100
3423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (30). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHB (69). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (34). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (44). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (61). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHBFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLVI26.31N/A
+0.01%
State Street®HlthCrSelSectSPDR®PrmETF
BOXX117.40N/A
N/A
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
QSPT34.64-0.25
-0.71%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Buffer ETF Sep
SZK21.26-0.28
-1.30%
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
CHIQ16.99-0.23
-1.31%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
-3.29%
FNB - FHB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
ASB - FHB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
UBSI - FHB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
FULT - FHB
85%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
AUB - FHB
85%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.04%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
ONB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
UBSI - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
More