FHN
Price
$21.55
Change
+$0.53 (+2.52%)
Updated
Feb 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.55B
52 days until earnings call
MBINM
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Updated
Feb 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

FHN vs MBINM

Header iconFHN vs MBINM Comparison
Open Charts FHN vs MBINMBanner chart's image
First Horizon
Price$21.55
Change+$0.53 (+2.52%)
Volume$55.72K
Capitalization8.55B
Merchants Ban
Price$26.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.19K
CapitalizationN/A
FHN vs MBINM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. MBINM commentary
Mar 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a StrongBuy and MBINM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FHN: $21.54 vs. MBINM: $26.07)
Brand notoriety: FHN and MBINM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 112% vs. MBINM: 94%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $8.55B vs. MBINM: $0
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.55B. MBINM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FHN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while MBINM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN YTD gains are higher at: 6.951 vs. MBINM (1.519). FHN has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than FHN: MBINM (964M) vs FHN (1.48B). FHN has higher revenues than MBINM: FHN (3.16B) vs MBINM (559M).
FHNMBINMFHN / MBINM
Capitalization8.55BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.9511.519458%
P/E Ratio9.71N/A-
Revenue3.16B559M564%
Total Cash1.01B10.6M9,547%
Total Debt1.48B964M153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEE9.700.55
+6.01%
Lee Enterprises
TBPH9.350.08
+0.86%
Theravance Biopharma
SCL61.760.29
+0.47%
Stepan Co
DBX25.980.03
+0.12%
Dropbox
CHSCO26.53-0.29
-1.08%
CHS

FHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHN has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHN jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHN
1D Price
Change %
FHN100%
+2.47%
FNB - FHN
85%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
SNV - FHN
84%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
WTFC - FHN
83%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
IBOC - FHN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
ASB - FHN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with MBINO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then MBINO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+0.46%
MBINO - MBINM
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PNFPP - MBINM
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
HBANP - MBINM
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
FHN - MBINM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
WAL - MBINM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More