Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICDX vs TRAMX
FICDX vs TRAMX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs TRAMX
FICDX vs TRAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. TRAMX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a Buy and TRAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. TRAMX (104M). TRAMX pays higher dividends than FICDX: TRAMX (5.35) vs FICDX (0.71). FICDX was incepted earlier than TRAMX: FICDX (39 years) vs TRAMX (19 years). TRAMX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FICDX (0.84). TRAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.20 vs. FICDX (17.00). FICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRAMX: FICDX (0) vs TRAMX (2500). FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. TRAMX (2.39). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.22 vs. TRAMX (36.70).
| FICDX | TRAMX | FICDX / TRAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.30 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.75 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.273 | -0.785 | -1,181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 104M | 1,113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 5.35 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 2.39 | 571% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | 20.36 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.22 | 36.70 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.08 | 85.73 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers