FICO
Price
$1933.38
Change
+$7.32 (+0.38%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.06B
5 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.72
Change
+$1.26 (+1.63%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.1B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FICO vs QTWO

Header iconFICO vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts FICO vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Fair Isaac
Price$1933.38
Change+$7.32 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization31.06B
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.72
Change+$1.26 (+1.63%)
Volume$353
Capitalization3.1B
FICO vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FICO vs. QTWO commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FICO: $1926.06 vs. QTWO: $77.46)
Brand notoriety: FICO and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FICO: 89% vs. QTWO: 55%
Market capitalization -- FICO: $31.06B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
FICO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $31.06B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FICO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FICO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FICO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FICO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

FICO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.99% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICO($31.1B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). FICO YTD gains are higher at: -3.258 vs. QTWO (-23.040). FICO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 676M vs. QTWO (15.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. FICO (160M). QTWO has less debt than FICO: QTWO (549M) vs FICO (1.99B). FICO has higher revenues than QTWO: FICO (1.55B) vs QTWO (625M).
FICOQTWOFICO / QTWO
Capitalization31.1B3.11B1,002%
EBITDA676M15.6M4,333%
Gain YTD-3.258-23.04014%
P/E Ratio70.12N/A-
Revenue1.55B625M248%
Total Cash160M324M49%
Total Debt1.99B549M362%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FICO vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FICO
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1182
SMR RATING
1..100
1091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FICO (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FICO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (56) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FICOQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFBD1.000.07
+7.38%
Infobird Co Ltd
BZUN2.360.08
+3.51%
Baozun
PNR87.751.51
+1.75%
Pentair plc
VMEO5.020.08
+1.62%
Vimeo
OUT14.650.04
+0.27%
OUTFRONT Media Inc

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
+2.84%
DSGX - FICO
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
QTWO - FICO
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
PANW - FICO
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
SAP - FICO
51%
Loosely correlated
+7.56%
ADSK - FICO
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+3.34%
ACIW - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
ALKT - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.46%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
EVCM - QTWO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
LYFT - QTWO
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
More