FICO
Price
$2348.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
70 days until earnings call
SAP
Price
$230.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FICO vs SAP

Header iconFICO vs SAP Comparison
Open Charts FICO vs SAPBanner chart's image
Fair Isaac
Price$2348.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$135.09K
CapitalizationN/A
SAP SE
Price$230.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.49M
CapitalizationN/A
FICO vs SAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FICO vs. SAP commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a StrongBuy and SAP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FICO: $2348.45 vs. SAP: $230.00)
Brand notoriety: FICO and SAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FICO: 90% vs. SAP: 171%
Market capitalization -- FICO: $31.06B vs. SAP: $227.47B
FICO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $31.06B. SAP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $227.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FICO’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FICO’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the long-term than SAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FICO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FICO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FICO and SAP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +12.33% price change this week, while SAP (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FICO is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

SAP is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAP($227B) has a higher market cap than FICO($31.1B). FICO has higher P/E ratio than SAP: FICO (70.12) vs SAP (58.94). FICO YTD gains are higher at: 101.755 vs. SAP (50.648). SAP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.5B vs. FICO (676M). SAP has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FICO (160M). FICO has less debt than SAP: FICO (1.99B) vs SAP (8.79B). SAP has higher revenues than FICO: SAP (31.2B) vs FICO (1.55B).
FICOSAPFICO / SAP
Capitalization31.1B227B14%
EBITDA676M7.5B9%
Gain YTD101.75550.648201%
P/E Ratio70.1258.94119%
Revenue1.55B31.2B5%
Total Cash160M11.5B1%
Total Debt1.99B8.79B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FICO vs SAP: Fundamental Ratings
FICO
SAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1668
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
124
SMR RATING
1..100
1078
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1641
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAP's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FICO (92). This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAP (24). This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAP (78). This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than SAP’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAP (43). This means that FICO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAP’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAP (41). This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FICOSAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRSH3.34-0.01
-0.15%
Jerash Holdings (US)
AMP559.89-1.42
-0.25%
Ameriprise Financial
HBCP50.42-0.27
-0.53%
Home Bancorp
NFG60.93-0.34
-0.55%
National Fuel Gas Co
PDFS31.88-0.95
-2.89%
PDF Solutions

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
+0.01%
DSGX - FICO
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
COIN - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
-10.78%
COMP - FICO
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNPS - FICO
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SAP - FICO
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
More