Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FRBAX
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FRBAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.86
Change-$0.21 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$28.95
Change-$0.48 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets823.68M
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FRBAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and FRBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FRBAX (824M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FRBAX (1.73) vs FIDSX (1.36). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FRBAX (34 years). FRBAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBAX: FIDSX (0) vs FRBAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. FRBAX (8.11). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 108.34 vs. FRBAX (61.80).
| FIDSX | FRBAX | FIDSX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.27 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.594 | 2.332 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 824M | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.73 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 8.11 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.25 | -1.42 | -2,840% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.34 | 61.80 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 60.61 | 154% |