Ad is loading...
FIDSX vs FRBAX
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FRBAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$14.74
Change+$0.16 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets980.97M
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$27.03
Change+$0.57 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets765.15M
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FRBAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and FRBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. FRBAX (765M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FRBAX (1.91) vs FIDSX (1.50). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDSX (43 years) vs FRBAX (33 years). FRBAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBAX: FIDSX (0) vs FRBAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.16 vs. FRBAX (9.17). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 119.56 vs. FRBAX (62.44).
| FIDSX | FRBAX | FIDSX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.27 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.008 | -6.920 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 981M | 765M | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.91 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.16 | 9.17 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.91 | -2.64 | -1,472% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.56 | 62.44 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.36 | 54.01 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers