Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs HSSCX
FIDSX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$26.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26M
FIDSX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. HSSCX (51.3M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FIDSX (1.36) vs HSSCX (0.00). FIDSX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FIDSX (44 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HSSCX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FIDSX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.57 vs. FIDSX (17.95). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 114.89 vs. HSSCX (26.58).
| FIDSX | HSSCX | FIDSX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.686 | 15.269 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 51.3M | 2,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.95 | 22.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.33 | 21.55 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.89 | 26.58 | 432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.37 | 7.20 | 1,560% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement