Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.49
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.16M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. RMBKX (211M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.37) vs RMBKX (1.17). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.31 vs. RMBKX (-6.31). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 81.59 vs. RMBKX (41.52).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.108 | -0.240 | -1,710% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 211M | 475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.17 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.31 | -6.31 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.38 | -2.46 | -1,642% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.59 | 41.52 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.30 | 53.12 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement