Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.90
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.72
Change-$0.71 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.22M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a StrongBuy and RMBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBKX (217M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.36) vs RMBKX (1.21). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.25 vs. RMBKX (17.74). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 126.65 vs. RMBKX (108.03).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.939 | 0.961 | 826% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 217M | 501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.21 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.25 | 17.74 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.74 | 8.14 | 759% |
| Returns for 5 years | 126.65 | 108.03 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.40 | 70.95 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement