Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.11
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$50.94
Change+$0.71 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.45M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RMBKX (218M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.32) vs RMBKX (1.14). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. RMBKX (11.30). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 119.75 vs. RMBKX (85.72).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.275 | 1.982 | 417% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 218M | 491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 11.30 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.60 | 4.97 | 1,098% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.75 | 85.72 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.25 | 71.39 | 160% |