Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$53.10
Change+$0.28 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.55M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBLX (223M). FIDSX (1.31) and RMBLX (1.30) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.16 vs. RMBLX (8.70). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 118.13 vs. RMBLX (94.16).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.543 | 3.305 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 223M | 487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.30 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.16 | 8.70 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.77 | 6.57 | 803% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.13 | 94.16 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers