Ad is loading...
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$13.50
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$44.29
Change+$0.57 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. RMBLX (187M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBLX: FIDSX (1.53) vs RMBLX (1.45). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (43 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). RMBLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.72). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. FIDSX (11.16). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 108.81 vs. RMBLX (91.51).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.13 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.13 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.738 | -13.378 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 187M | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.45 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.16 | 16.73 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | -15.31 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.81 | 91.51 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers