Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.42
Change-$0.36 (-2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.47
Change-$1.18 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.06M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBLX (203M). RMBLX (1.41) and FIDSX (1.36) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.46 vs. RMBLX (2.88). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 112.71 vs. RMBLX (88.42).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.637 | -5.202 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 203M | 538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.41 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.46 | 2.88 | 502% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.44 | -3.05 | -1,555% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.71 | 88.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement