Ad is loading...
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$14.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.52M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RMBLX (192M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBLX: FIDSX (1.46) vs RMBLX (1.35). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (43 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). RMBLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.72). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX (18.74) and FIDSX (18.08) have marching annual gain over last year. FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 102.18 vs. RMBLX (79.51).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.13 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.13 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.140 | -5.261 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 192M | 582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.35 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.08 | 18.74 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.04 | -13.84 | -188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.18 | 79.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...