Ad is loading...
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$14.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets980.97M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.7M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX (1.51) and FIDSX (1.50) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (43 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). RMBLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. FIDSX (14.96). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 121.97 vs. RMBLX (95.42).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.13 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.13 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.933 | -5.770 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 981M | 205M | 479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.51 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 16.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.58 | -2.35 | -1,768% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.97 | 95.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.05 | N/A | - |