Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.34
Change+$0.25 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.67
Change-$0.25 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.78M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. RMBLX (199M). RMBLX (1.45) and FIDSX (1.42) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. RMBLX (18.07). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 88.12 vs. RMBLX (58.76).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.419 | -8.234 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 199M | 526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.81 | 18.07 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | -8.81 | -417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.12 | 58.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement