Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs FSMTX
FIWGX vs FSMTX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs FSMTX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.97B
Fidelity SAI Total Bond
Price$9.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.75B
FIWGX vs FSMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. FSMTX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and FSMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 85B vs. FSMTX (21.8B). FSMTX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: FSMTX (4.57) vs FIWGX (4.25). FIWGX was incepted earlier than FSMTX: FIWGX (7 years) vs FSMTX (7 years). FIWGX (0.41) is less costly to investors than FSMTX (0.29). FSMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. FIWGX (207.00). FIWGX (0) and FSMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMTX (6.83) and FIWGX (6.59) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.76 vs. FIWGX (-0.40).
| FIWGX | FSMTX | FIWGX / FSMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.29 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.436 | 7.464 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85B | 21.8B | 390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 4.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 6.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.36 | 24.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.40 | 5.76 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers