Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs RFCTX
FIWGX vs RFCTX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs RFCTX
FIWGX vs RFCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. RFCTX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and RFCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. RFCTX (2.41B). RFCTX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: RFCTX (5.05) vs FIWGX (4.38). FIWGX was incepted earlier than RFCTX: FIWGX (8 years) vs RFCTX (18 years). RFCTX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FIWGX (0.41). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. RFCTX (56.00). FIWGX (0) and RFCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.15 vs. RFCTX (4.25). FIWGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.88 vs. RFCTX (-2.91).
| FIWGX | RFCTX | FIWGX / RFCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.56 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.68 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.128 | 0.602 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2B | 2.41B | 3,864% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 5.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.15 | 4.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.09 | 12.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.88 | -2.91 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement