FIZZ vs POOL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a StrongBuy and POOL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOOL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- POOL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POOL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- POOL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while POOL (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Jun 26, 2025.
POOL is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.98% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Wholesale Distributors (+1.22% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| FIZZ | POOL | FIZZ / POOL | |
| Capitalization | 4.63B | 15.5B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 248M | 787M | 32% |
| Gain YTD | 2.250 | -12.939 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.31 | 30.08 | 91% |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 5.54B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 277M | 66.5M | 417% |
| Total Debt | 58.2M | 1.36B | 4% |
FIZZ | POOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
POOL's Valuation (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as POOL (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as POOL (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as POOL (62) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
POOL's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FIZZ (64) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | POOL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FRA | 12.58 | 0.05 | +0.40% |
| Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund | |||
| DES | 30.30 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF | |||
| BWEB | 52.44 | N/A | N/A |
| Bitwise Web3 ETF | |||
| GSJY | 40.18 | -0.24 | -0.58% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF | |||
| CHAU | 13.65 | -0.29 | -2.08% |
| Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF | |||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FIZZ and PEP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIZZ and PEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| MNST - FIZZ | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| KO - FIZZ | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| COCO - FIZZ | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
POOL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POOL has been closely correlated with SITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POOL jumps, then SITE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POOL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POOL | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| SITE - POOL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| FERG - POOL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| BXC - POOL | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WSO - POOL | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| GWW - POOL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||