Advertisement
FIZZ vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Buy and ZM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.97% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Packaged Software (+1.80% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FIZZ | ZM | FIZZ / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 4.63B | 20.1B | 23% |
| EBITDA | 248M | 630M | 39% |
| Gain YTD | 7.429 | -4.227 | -176% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.31 | 31.27 | 87% |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 4.53B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 277M | 6.96B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 58.2M | 73M | 80% |
FIZZ | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FIZZ (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as ZM (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FIZZ (67) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| MNST - FIZZ | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| KO - FIZZ | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| COCO - FIZZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||