Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGAEX
FKACX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGAEX
FKACX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKACX (4.59B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FKACX (27 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). FKACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKACX (27.59). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGAEX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.23 vs. FKACX (-15.39). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 15.67 vs. FKACX (-41.05).
| FKACX | RGAEX | FKACX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.320 | 7.135 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.39 | 4.23 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.28 | 39.08 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.05 | 15.67 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.85 | 102.11 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement