Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGAEX
FKACX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGAEX
FKACX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGAEX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGAEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKACX (4.56B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGAEX (0.22) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FKACX (27 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). FKACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKACX (27.59). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGAEX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. FKACX (-16.94). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 16.59 vs. FKACX (-41.58).
| FKACX | RGAEX | FKACX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.670 | 10.009 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.94 | 5.82 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.60 | 43.51 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.58 | 16.59 | -251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.25 | 103.84 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement