Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKARX vs RGAFX
FKARX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FKARX vs RGAFX
FKARX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKARX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKARX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FKARX (4.31B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FKARX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FKARX (0.00). FKARX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FKARX (25 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FKARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FKARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.14 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKARX: RGAFX (250) vs FKARX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. FKARX (-14.25). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. FKARX (-31.32).
| FKARX | RGAFX | FKARX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.34 | 335% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.34 | 335% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.297 | 9.276 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.31B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.25 | 0.42 | -3,407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.20 | 44.36 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.32 | 14.74 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.51 | 109.80 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement