Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKARX vs RGAFX
FKARX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FKARX vs RGAFX
FKARX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKARX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKARX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKARX (4.59B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FKARX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FKARX (0.00). FKARX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FKARX (25 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FKARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKARX (27.59). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKARX: RGAFX (250) vs FKARX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. FKARX (-7.35). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. FKARX (-26.62).
| FKARX | RGAFX | FKARX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.34 | 335% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.34 | 335% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.602 | 7.299 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.35 | 4.67 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.36 | 40.73 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.62 | 17.46 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 105.95 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement