Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIDX vs RERAX
FKIDX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FKIDX vs RERAX
FKIDX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIDX vs. RERAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIDX is a Buy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FKIDX (5.26B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FKIDX: RERAX (2.19) vs FKIDX (1.72). FKIDX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FKIDX (9 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). FKIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FKIDX (0) vs RERAX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.39 vs. RERAX (13.13). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.73 vs. RERAX (-6.22).
| FKIDX | RERAX | FKIDX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.57 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.57 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.835 | 11.224 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.26B | 137B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 2.19 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.39 | 13.13 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 27.83 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.73 | -6.22 | -719% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.27 | - |