Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIDX vs RERAX
FKIDX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FKIDX vs RERAX
FKIDX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIDX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIDX is a Buy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FKIDX (5.34B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FKIDX: RERAX (2.25) vs FKIDX (1.67). FKIDX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FKIDX (9 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FKIDX (45.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FKIDX (0) vs RERAX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. RERAX (0.55). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.74 vs. RERAX (-11.08).
| FKIDX | RERAX | FKIDX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.57 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.57 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.779 | 0.784 | 1,375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.34B | 141B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.25 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 0.55 | 3,222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.37 | 11.91 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.74 | -11.08 | -377% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement