FKKFY
Price
$12.10
Change
-$0.88 (-6.78%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
MFG
Price
$5.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
49.2B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FKKFY vs MFG

Header iconFKKFY vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts FKKFY vs MFGBanner chart's image
Fukuoka Financial Group
Price$12.10
Change-$0.88 (-6.78%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization4.56B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$5.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization49.2B
FKKFY vs MFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKKFY vs. MFG commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKKFY is a Hold and MFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FKKFY: $12.10 vs. MFG: $5.08)
Brand notoriety: FKKFY and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKKFY: 253% vs. MFG: 129%
Market capitalization -- FKKFY: $4.56B vs. MFG: $49.2B
FKKFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.56B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKKFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FKKFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than FKKFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKKFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKKFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than FKKFY.

Price Growth

FKKFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.84% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than FKKFY($4.56B). FKKFY has higher P/E ratio than MFG: FKKFY (21.05) vs MFG (11.31). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 3.885 vs. FKKFY (-2.460). FKKFY has less debt than MFG: FKKFY (4.51T) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than FKKFY: MFG (2.88T) vs FKKFY (251B).
FKKFYMFGFKKFY / MFG
Capitalization4.56B49.2B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.4603.885-63%
P/E Ratio21.0511.31186%
Revenue251B2.88T9%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.51T20.53T22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKKFY vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
FKKFY
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
287
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKKFY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FKKFY’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (28) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (1) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (61) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKKFY (81) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKKFYMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONIT33.951.17
+3.57%
Onity Group Inc.
SFBS89.021.81
+2.08%
ServisFirst Bancshares
WAT404.00-1.43
-0.35%
Waters Corp
VRAR1.95-0.03
-1.52%
Glimpse Group (The)
HCSG11.70-0.22
-1.85%
Healthcare Services Group

FKKFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKKFY and DBSDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKKFY and DBSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKKFY
1D Price
Change %
FKKFY100%
N/A
DBSDF - FKKFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
MFG - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
BKHPF - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.39%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
SBNY - MFG
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
DBSDY - MFG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
AMTB - MFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
NWG - MFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More