FKKFY
Price
$14.65
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.02 (-0.31%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.12B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKKFY vs MFG

Header iconFKKFY vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts FKKFY vs MFGBanner chart's image
Fukuoka Financial Group
Price$14.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$121
Capitalization5.39B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization81.12B
FKKFY vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
FKKFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKKFY vs. MFG commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKKFY is a Hold and MFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FKKFY: $14.65 vs. MFG: $6.55)
Brand notoriety: FKKFY and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKKFY: 10% vs. MFG: 121%
Market capitalization -- FKKFY: $5.39B vs. MFG: $81.12B
FKKFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.39B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKKFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FKKFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKKFY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKKFY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the short-term than MFG.

Price Growth

FKKFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.1B) has a higher market cap than FKKFY($5.39B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than FKKFY: MFG (13.00) vs FKKFY (11.19). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 33.947 vs. FKKFY (18.129). FKKFY has less debt than MFG: FKKFY (7.99T) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than FKKFY: MFG (3.61T) vs FKKFY (286B).
FKKFYMFGFKKFY / MFG
Capitalization5.39B81.1B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.12933.94753%
P/E Ratio11.1913.0086%
Revenue286B3.61T8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.99T22.19T36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKKFY vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
FKKFY
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2515
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3927
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKKFY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FKKFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (25) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (1) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (50) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FKKFY (39) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKKFYMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKKFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BANX21.750.60
+2.84%
ArrowMark Financial Corp
DFAS65.900.21
+0.32%
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
DIVY25.540.04
+0.14%
Sound Equity Dividend Income ETF
GIGL50.950.04
+0.08%
Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF
STK34.50-0.76
-2.16%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund

FKKFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKKFY and DBSDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKKFY and DBSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKKFY
1D Price
Change %
FKKFY100%
N/A
DBSDF - FKKFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.06%
MFG - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
BKHPF - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-3.39%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
HBAN - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
DB - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
NWG - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
LYG - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More