INSW($5.13B) has a higher market cap than FLNG($1.72B). FLNG has higher P/E ratio than INSW: FLNG (16.68) vs INSW (6.63). INSW YTD gains are higher at: 144.758 vs. FLNG (37.123). INSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. FLNG (267M). INSW has less debt than FLNG: INSW (653M) vs FLNG (1.79B). INSW has higher revenues than FLNG: INSW (1.26B) vs FLNG (360M).

	FLNG	INSW	FLNG / INSW
Capitalization	1.72B	5.13B	33%
EBITDA	267M	982M	27%
Gain YTD	37.123	144.758	26%
P/E Ratio	16.68	6.63	252%
Revenue	360M	1.26B	29%
Total Cash	397M	N/A	-
Total Debt	1.79B	653M	275%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

FLNG vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings

	FLNG	INSW
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	40	42
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	5 Undervalued	2 Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	9	4
SMR RATING 1..100	59	27
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	41	35
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	24	80
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INSW's Valuation (2) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (5) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (9) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's SMR Rating (27) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (59) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (41) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INSW (80) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than INSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	FLNG	INSW
RSI ODDS (%)	N/A	2 days ago 62%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	2 days ago 69%	2 days ago 59%
Momentum ODDS (%)	2 days ago 65%	2 days ago 83%
MACD ODDS (%)	2 days ago 72%	2 days ago 85%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	2 days ago 66%	2 days ago 79%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	2 days ago 62%	2 days ago 80%
Advances ODDS (%)	2 days ago 65%	2 days ago 77%
Declines ODDS (%)	20 days ago 62%	13 days ago 69%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	2 days ago 70%	2 days ago 62%
Aroon ODDS (%)	2 days ago 57%	2 days ago 72%

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 12, 2026

Stock price -- (FLNG: $31.70 vs. INSW: $103.65)

Brand notoriety: FLNG and INSW are both not notable

Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNG: 130% vs. INSW: 192%

Market capitalization -- FLNG: $1.71B vs. INSW: $5.13B

FLNG [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.71B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $5.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $7.66K to $104.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while INSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.

According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the long-term than INSW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

FLNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
INSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, both FLNG and INSW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +4.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2026.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.12% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

View a ticker or compare two or three

FLNG

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

INSW

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

NEWTechnology - Trading Results
AI Trading Agent, 60min NEWTechnology - Trading Results
AI Trading Agent, 60min

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

ETFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FTCE	27.37	0.32	+1.18%
First Trust New Cstrcts Cr Erns Ldrs ETF
FYX	139.61	0.89	+0.64%
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
HELS	23.49	0.13	+0.55%
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
EOD	6.43	0.01	+0.13%
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund
FCBD	25.00	0.01	+0.04%
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF

FLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To FLNG	1D Price Change %
FLNG	100%	+0.28%
NVGS - FLNG	54% Loosely correlated	+0.61%
NAT - FLNG	52% Loosely correlated	+3.47%
TK - FLNG	51% Loosely correlated	+1.99%
TNK - FLNG	50% Loosely correlated	+2.63%
INSW - FLNG	49% Loosely correlated	+1.48%
More

INSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To INSW	1D Price Change %
INSW	100%	+1.48%
TNK - INSW	86% Closely correlated	+2.63%
TK - INSW	82% Closely correlated	+1.99%
TEN - INSW	82% Closely correlated	+7.13%
FRO - INSW	81% Closely correlated	+1.67%
DHT - INSW	81% Closely correlated	+2.66%
More